confession: The years I spent as a print journalist covering government and politics acclimated me to being comfortable saying things that make some people uncomfortable. My wife thinks I even enjoy it.

So here it goes: Compared with some other cities, Lafayette is just not that special. We’re good, not great. We’ve got a lot of work to do to get to great, and we are going to have to fundamentally change the way we do a few things before we can improve.

In late April, I returned from a canvass trip to Lexington, Ky., sponsored by One Acadiana. The idea of a canvass trip is to visit another city, talk to its leaders, see the sites, and figure out what you can learn from the successes those cities have had. We’ve taken similar trips to Oklahoma City and Charleston, S.C.

And every time I get back to town, I worry that Lafayette leaders see the great success these cities have had — Lexington is pretty awesome, y’all — but don’t fully grasp the pain and hard work it took for those cities to get there.

Advertisement

And I also worry that those of us who love Lafayette gloss over our faults with heavy doses of festivals, food and culture.

But self-delusion isn’t pretty or useful — consider those disastrous American Idol tryouts from adults whose parents always told them they had a beautiful singing voice. Just because you love something doesn’t mean you shouldn’t be honest about its faults.

I will use Lexington/Fayette County as a comparison (it also has a city-county consolidated government with a population of 318,000 compared to Lafayette’s 241,000):

Lexington’s population growth rate was more than twice Lafayette’s in the last five years and has almost half Lafayette’s unemployment rate. Lexington has higher rates of educational attainment — more than 40 percent of its adults have a bachelor’s degree and an additional 19 percent have an advanced degree (compared to 20.8 percent and 9.2 percent for Lafayette, respectively). That’s, in large part, because a high number of graduates of the University of Kentucky decide to stay in town after graduation, drawn to the quality of life the city offers.

Lexington’s urban core is growing and thriving, with new high-rise residential projects underway, a great restaurant and nightlife scene, and large, ambitious city projects like a linear park that runs through Downtown and the renovation of an old courthouse building.

We are stumbling by comparison. We all agree that Lafayette needs residential living Downtown, but haven’t figured out how to get there. The old federal courthouse building is an eyesore, but successive renovation or tear-down plans have foundered over the years.

Where Lexington recently passed a new tax initiative to improve school facilities, we resoundingly voted one down. Where Lexington wins awards for good government practices, our voters decided to stop funding the courthouse and jail.

And let’s face it: The debate over the I-49 Connector, which will run through the middle of the city, Downtown and historic neighborhoods, has taken a lot of oxygen out of the room, overshadowing a lot of other necessary work for the last two years now, and possibly for years to come.

And so coming back home from a visit to a place like Lexington (or Charleston, or Oklahoma City — heck, even Lake Charles is building tons of residential spaces Downtown) can be a little deflating and depressing.

This should make you uncomfortable; we should all be.

But we shouldn’t despair, because a willingness to be uncomfortable may be just what a city needs to tackle its challenges.

The debate over the I-49 Connector has taken a lot of oxygen out of the room, overshadowing a lot of other necessary work for the last two years now, and possibly for years to come.

Lexington has seen its fair share of discomfort and discord. In 1958, Lexington adopted the country’s first Urban Growth Boundary, which can be explained at its most basic level by saying the city drew a circle around its urban core and said, “You can’t develop outside of this circle.”

Why? Lexington is beautifully-situated in the rolling hills and sprawling horse farms of Bluegrass Country — but that bucolic setting is also the site of big business: The horse racing industry is one of the main drivers of the region’s economy. Only about one-third of the county, as a result, is allowed to be developed in a traditional manner.

And so every five years, the people of Lexington debate whether to extend this growth boundary and allow for more development. And by debate, I mean argue. There are special interest groups on both sides. One year a popular bumper sticker read: “Growth Destroys Bluegrass Forever.”

Most of the officials we talked with on the trip openly discussed the issue from their respective viewpoints — from the economic development official who described herself as “all growth” to the Downtown developer/horse industry attorney who talked about the need to “build up, rather than build out.”

Mayor Jim Gray, a former construction company CEO, described it as “a balancing act between development and preservation.” And the urban growth boundary has helped promote the vibrant urban development that’s happening today.

The planning commission is considering expanding the boundary right now, and who knows what Lexington will decide. That’s not really the point, anyhow.

The point is that all of these public officials, despite their differences of opinion on a very contentious issue, are still capable of working together for the common good. Despite their definite urban/rural split — like a happy, old married couple — they’ve gotten good at disagreement.

And as a result, things are really clicking the last few years in Lexington. A linear park Downtown, a public-private partnership to renovate the old courthouse, a new convention center and an effort to build affordable housing are all moving forward under the mayor’s leadership.

Mayor Gray acknowledged it wasn’t always great in Lexington either. “Things weren’t going well,” he said. Some of the projects underway now had been floundering for 20 years and had become “impossible.”

“But when citizens really, really want something, then public officials will do their best to get it done,” Gray said. “We needed to put our nose to the grindstone and materialize on the vision of these projects.”

The people in Lexington don’t necessarily have more common sense than we do. There wasn’t a magic bullet. They have just developed what Mayor Gray called the right “attitude.” An attitude developed over years of honest disagreement and push and pull, followed by compromise, consensus and resolute action.

We can do that, too. We can band together to find a solution to the federal building site Downtown. We can finish building the Horse Farm into a world-class passive park. Let’s start investing in our oldest neighborhoods. Let’s invest in our public schools.

Will we start labeling each other as “pro-interstate” or “anti-interstate” based on our views and philosophies about design? Will we get increasingly uncomfortable talking about the hard decisions? Or will we respect our differences and find compromise?

Let’s tackle the elephant in the room.

In late March, the executive committee that makes decisions about the I-49 Connector decided to scrap an idea to partially cap the interstate and instead focus on building an elevated interstate through town.

A couple of citizen groups working on the project expressed concern that the decision was premature. I have good friends — people who are leaders in this community, people who love Lafayette — with very different views.

Some think the idea of an elevated interstate through an urban area of town will replicate the mistakes of the past, when bulky, disruptive infrastructure projects tore through the fabric of mostly poor neighborhoods — the way the Evangeline Thruway did decades ago.

Others just as passionately believe that any investment is better than nothing, that the Thruway corridor can’t get worse, and that we know more now about how to build a more “context sensitive” interstate.

For the record, I believe that you cannot “build it right” without having a community-wide consensus on what “right” means. And we aren’t there yet.

I don’t know anyone involved who doesn’t hope for the best outcome, and who doesn’t want for this project to be a net positive for the community.

But we have to get better at arguing. Over the last months, the public discussion has been disappointing and frustrating. Some folks don’t feel like they are being listened to. Friends on opposite sides of the fence feel uncomfortable having the discussion together.

We can’t avoid the conversation any longer. In a month or two the design process will pick up again. Will there be a signature bridge? How will we clean up widespread contamination in the project’s right of way? Can we be imaginative enough to not just treat the remaining sections of the Thruway like a frontage road, but to transform them it into a safe, pedestrian-friendly street?

Those are all hard decisions. They involve competing interests. There are funding considerations. The only certain thing is that we will all not agree.

Will we start labeling each other as “pro-interstate” or “anti-interstate” based on our views and philosophies about design? Will we get increasingly uncomfortable talking about the hard decisions? Or will we respect our differences and find compromise?

Will we acknowledge our challenges and tackle them head on, or will we let those challenges overwhelm us into inaction?

Lafayette can be the next great American city — a city that other cities take canvass trips to — but only if we recognize that we can’t build consensus in a vacuum. It takes hard work. It takes honesty. And it takes a community-wide willingness to engage with people with whom we disagree and to compromise.

About the Author

Kevin Blanchard covered local government for The Advocate. He later ran Lafayette's Public Works Department. He's currently the chief operating officer of Southern Lifestyle Development.

One Comment

  1. Well said Kevin. You are right about a lack of community consensus on what “done right” means. The Downtown Development Authority(DDA) took a stab at this a while back. Here is what we think done right would look like for Downtown. There are other issues to consider elsewhere in the corridor, but this is a good place to start.

    The I-49 Connector “Done Right”

    The I-49 Connector is the largest proposed transportation project in Lafayette
    history, covering more than five miles between I-10 and the airport, and potentially
    costing as much as one billion dollars.
    It has the potential to serve as a regional economic engine for our community as
    well as dramatically improve the existing corridor which has suffered from neglect for
    decades. At the same time, community leaders have made it clear that it will not have a
    positive impact upon the existing corridor if it is not “done right.”
    Our current challenge is that no one has defined “done right,” and so long as we
    do not reach a community consensus on what “done right” means, we will not have the
    consensus that will be required for us to receive the necessary state and federal funding
    over projects being promoted in other regions of Louisiana.
    The Downtown Development Authority (DDA) has been involved with the
    planning of the proposed I-49 Connector for decades because of its proposed alignment
    through the downtown district. The DDA is committed to ensuring that the I-49
    Connector is “done right” for a wide range of reasons, not the least of which are that
    downtown serves as the cultural center of our region as well as the preferred location
    for our growing high tech industry.
    Over the past seven months the Louisiana Department of Transportation and
    Development (DOTD) has worked with our community to help develop consensus on a
    vision for the I-49 Connector. At the beginning of that process the DDA provided DOTD
    its seven criteria for what “done right” means.
    The first and most critical requirement is reducing the noise so that it will not
    undermine the cultural events or development opportunities that are within close
    proximity of the proposed interstate. The I-49 Connector must ensure that noise
    volumes do not exceed decibel levels that violate our Sound Ordinance—- negatively
    impacting cultural events as well as development opportunities.
    The second requirement is to design the I-49 Connector so that vehicles exiting
    into the downtown and surrounding neighborhood streets are not going faster than 25
    mph. This is necessary in any urban setting for two reasons. First, the value of the
    buildings will be undermined if the vehicles go faster than 25 mph due to the noise and
    threat of a vehicle running into a building (since the buildings in an urban setting come
    up to the sidewalk). Second, walking and biking are critical elements of a successful
    urban setting, but walking and biking are not safe when mixed with vehicles going more
    than 25 mph.
    The third requirement is to maintain a high degree of connectivity within the
    existing network of streets. In addition to protecting the connections between the
    downtown and surrounding neighborhoods, this will help avoid the creation of traffic
    congestion that occurs when direct routes are eliminated.
    The fourth requirement is to eliminate the two massive downtown interchanges in
    favor of using ramps that could more favorably plug into the existing network of streets.
    The interchanges remove approximately 50 acres of developable land from our
    economy, plus they undermine the connectivity of the existing street network.
    The fifth requirement is to make sure that any version of the interstate works in
    conjunction with the Congress Street corridor plan. This is effectively accomplished by
    removing the massive downtown interchanges, maintaining a high degree of
    connectivity within the existing network of streets, and keeping exit speeds below 25
    mph.
    The sixth requirement is to make it beautiful because this is the primary gateway
    to our community and the backdrop for the cultural center of our region.
    The final requirement is to provide meaningful economic development
    opportunities adjacent to the interstate, and that will happen if the first six requirements
    are met.
    Let’s not delay any longer. Let’s move forward with an I-49 Connector “done
    right.”

    Log in to reply

Leave a Comment